Skip Navigation

Journal of Molluscan Studies 2005 71(4):313-318; doi:10.1093/mollus/eyi037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARVAJAL-RODRÍGUEZ, A.
Right arrow Articles by ROLÁN-ALVAREZ, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CARVAJAL-RODRÍGUEZ, A.
Right arrow Articles by ROLÁN-ALVAREZ, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Studies on behalf of The Malacological Society of London, all rights reserved

DECOMPOSING SHELL FORM INTO SIZE AND SHAPE BY GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC METHODS IN TWO SYMPATRIC ECOTYPES OF LITTORINA SAXATILIS

A. CARVAJAL-RODRÍGUEZ, P. CONDE-PADÍN and E. ROLÁN-ALVAREZ

Departamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Vigo, 36200 Vigo, Spain

Correspondence: E. Rolán-Alvarez; e-mail: rolan{at}uvigo.es

Two sympatric snail ecotypes (RB and SU) of Littorina saxatilis from exposed rocky shores of NW Spain differ in many life history traits, but classical morphometric analysis has failed to reveal significant shell shape differences between them. We used geometric morphometric methods on landmark data from digitized shell images to study size and shape components in both ecotypes at two localities. The results showed significant differences between ecotypes in both shell size and shape (both uniform and non-uniform components). Allometry was also detected for some component of the local variation in shape, although it did not explain the observed differences between ecotypes. The SU ecotype had a relatively rounded shell shape with a big aperture, whereas the RB ecotype had higher spire and smaller aperture. We suggest that shape differentiation is correlated with adaptive differences between ecotypes.

(Received 19 January 2004; accepted 5 January 2005)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.