Skip Navigation


Journal Molluscan Studies Advance Access originally published online on February 23, 2006
Journal of Molluscan Studies 2006 72(3):247-257; doi:10.1093/mollus/eyi069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/3/247    most recent
eyi069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, M.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, M.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Malacological Society of London, all rights reserved

Intertidal seawalls as habitats for molluscs

M.G. Chapman

Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities, Marine Ecology Laboratories A11, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Correspondence: e-mail: gee{at}bio.usyd.edu.au

Coastal urbanization changes intertidal shorelines, by alteration and destruction of natural habitat and addition of new built habitat. In Sydney Harbour, New South Wales, Australia, up to 50% of the shoreline is composed of constructed habitat, particularly seawalls. Research has shown that many components of intertidal assemblages live on seawalls, but patterns of abundance and diversity are very variable. Seawalls differ physically from natural shores in a number of ways that are likely to influence distribution and abundances of intertidal molluscs, which are very important determinants of structure of intertidal assemblages.

This study examined diversity, abundances and frequencies of occurrence of intertidal molluscs on seawalls and on natural horizontal and vertical shores in numerous locations in Sydney Harbour and in natural boulder-fields and artificial boulder-fields created from rubble of seawalls. On seawalls, assemblages varied between tidal heights and among locations, but when data were combined across locations, there were some general patterns. Sessile bivalves (oysters and mussels) and many limpets were found in similar numbers on both habitats, or patterns varied inconsistently. Many coiled snails, in contrast, including whelks and grazing gastropods, plus opisthobranchs, which were either common or relatively sparse on horizontal shores, were not found on seawalls and found in intermediate frequencies on vertical shores. Similarly, common species of molluscs were found in natural and artificial boulder-fields in similar numbers, or patterns were not consistent, although rarer species were not found in these boulder-fields. Because molluscs are such important contributors to intertidal dynamics, these results have important implications for management of intertidal biodiversity in urbanized and altered environments.

(Received 18 July 2005; accepted 9 November 2005)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.