Skip Navigation


Journal Molluscan Studies Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2007
Journal of Molluscan Studies 2007 73(4):333-337; doi:10.1093/mollus/eym031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/4/333    most recent
eym031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scolding, J.W.S.
Right arrow Articles by Luckenbach, M.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scolding, J.W.S.
Right arrow Articles by Luckenbach, M.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Malacological Society of London, all rights reserved

Predation of cockles (Cerastoderma edule) by the whelk (Buccinum undatum) under laboratory conditions

J.W.S. Scolding1, C.A. Richardson1, and M.J. Luckenbach2

1 School of Ocean Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK; and 2 Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Eastern Shore Laboratory, Wachapreague, Virginia, USA

Correspondence: C.A. Richardson; e-mail: c.a.richardson{at}bangor.ac.uk


  Abstract

The feeding rate and behaviour of whelks (Buccinum undatum) offered cockles (Cerastoderma edule) in laboratory experiments were examined. When presented with cockles in a range of sizes (10–40 mm), 14 B. undatum (34.6–88.3 mm), held individually in aquaria, consumed a wide size range of cockles. Small whelks (<40 mm) consumed cockles (<23 mm), whereas large whelks, (>60 mm) ate a greater number of larger cockles (>30 mm) and a wider size range of cockles (12–40 mm) than smaller whelks. The majority (90%) of the shells of the predated cockles were undamaged and the few (<10%) that were damaged showed only slight abrasions to the anterior and posterior shell margin. Filmed observations of B. undatum feeding on C. edule showed a method of attack that has not previously been reported and involved the use of the whelk's foot to asphyxiate the cockle or to pull the shell valves apart. No filmed evidence was found for the previously reported shell ‘wedging’ technique for prising open the closed shell valves of C. edule, although 10% of the shells of consumed cockles in feeding experiments had damaged shell margins.

(Received 4 April 2007; accepted 30 June 2007)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.