Skip Navigation


Journal Molluscan Studies Advance Access originally published online on August 19, 2008
Journal of Molluscan Studies 2008 74(4):337-343; doi:10.1093/mollus/eyn025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/4/337    most recent
eyn025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geist, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kuehn, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Geist, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kuehn, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Malacological Society of London, all rights reserved

Use of mollusc shells for DNA-based molecular analyses

Juergen Geist1, Heike Wunderlich1 and Ralph Kuehn2

1Fish Biology Unit, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, D-85350 Freising, Germany; and 2Unit of Molecular Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, D-85350 Freising, Germany

Correspondence: J. Geist; e-mail: geist{at}wzw.tum.de


  Abstract

Genetic approaches are increasingly being considered for investigations into the systematics and the conservation biology of molluscs. Here, we investigate the potential of using shell material for DNA-based analyses, using the example of endangered freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera). Tissue and shells from 15 dead specimens were sampled. Their shells were split into four-quarters and re-exposed to original stream water for zero (unexposed), 1, 3 and 6 months. The influences of exposure time and resulting shell degradation, different grinding procedures and different DNA extraction methods on the quantity and quality of extractable DNA were assessed, using tissue samples as a reference. A combination of short shell-exposure time, medium grinding size and phenol–chloroform extraction procedures resulted in the most robust PCR and in lowest microsatellite genotyping errors. Amplification of nine microsatellite loci was successful in 89% of samples derived from fresh shell DNA. Genotyping errors were mostly the result of false alleles (7.8%), whereas allelic dropout only occurred at a rate of 5.7%. Shell material re-exposed to stream water for ≥1 month did not produce reliable genotyping results but amplification of mitochondrial COI was still successful. Real-time quantitative PCR of microsatellite-flanking DNA regions was shown to be an effective tool for pre-assessing DNA-quantity in shell material. These results suggest that fresh shell material may be a useful source of DNA for genetic analyses in mollusc species if the increased risk of errors compared to the use of soft tissues is adequately addressed.

(Received 7 April 2008; accepted 20 June 2008)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.