Skip Navigation



Journal Molluscan Studies Advance Access published online on November 9, 2007
Journal of Molluscan Studies, doi:10.1093/mollus/eym029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/4/291    most recent
eym029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graf, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Graf, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Malacological Society of London, all rights reserved

REVIEW OF THE SYSTEMATICS AND GLOBAL DIVERSITY OF FRESHWATER MUSSEL SPECIES (BIVALVIA: UNIONOIDA)

Daniel L. Graf1, and Kevin S. Cummings2

1 Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA; and 2 Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL 61820, USA

Correspondence: D.L. Graf; e-mail: graf{at}ansp.org


  Abstract

Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) are interesting because of their unique life cycles, global aggregate distribution and ancient origin. They are also of practical importance due to their worldwide, imperiled status. Of utmost utility for their continued study are a modern assessment of global and regional species diversity and a natural classification that reflects phylogenetic patterns. The freshwater malacological community has taken steps toward satisfying the latter of these requirements, but a consensus census of mussel species has not been published since Fritz Haas's revisions of the late 1960s. We set out to describe the species-level diversity of the Unionoida by reviewing the secondary literature and developing a comprehensive taxonomic database. Each valid species was assigned to one or more geographical regions (i.e. Nearctica, Neotropica, Afrotropica, Palearctica, Indotropica and Australasia) and one or more subregions, and each valid genus was assigned to the lowest possible level in a classification derived from our own, recent phylogenetic analyses. Based upon a consensus of numerous regional works, our global estimate of freshwater mussel diversity is 840 species. Regional diversity was determined as follows: Nearctica: 302 spp., Neotropica: 172, Afrotropica: 85, Palearctica: 45, Indotropica: 219 and Australasia: 33. The largest family is the Unionidae, with 674 species. However, the classification of that taxon is currently in flux, and many genera (corresponding to 225 spp.) were assigned to incertae sedis geographical assemblages. Diversity patterns are discussed, and it is suggested that reevaluation of these faunas with modern methods will likely increase recognized species diversity, especially on the southern continents. Our checklist and classification of freshwater mussel species is included as an appendix and mirrored on the MUSSEL Project Web Site (http://www.mussel-project.net/).

(Received 10 May 2007; accepted 17 August 2007)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.