J. Moll. Stud. (1988), 54, 367-441
© The Malacological Society of London 1988
research-article |
ON THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF MAJOR GASTROPOD GROUPS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE STREPTONEURA
Institut f
r Zoologie der Universität Innsbruck Technikerstraße 25 A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
The phytogeny and evolutionary history of the strep-toneuran Gastropoda is reconsidered in the light of (i) recent discoveries of different types of organization, (ii) new data sets based on modern techniques, and (iii) the dado-evolutionary method to trace genealogical relationships. The phylogcnctic analysis by means of traditional (homology-analogy) and cladistic (apomorphy-plesiomorphy) character analysis reveals several conclusions:
(1) The Gastropoda originated by torsion from monoplacophoran ancestors after the Cephalopoda split off. Torsion itself is understood as a two-step process, resulting in advantages for the larvae (presence of operculum) and for the adults (anterior mantle cavity). All Gastropoda form a holophyletic group
(2) The proposed gastropod archetype differs Largely from previous suggestions in being more similar to docoglossate gastropocls than to zeugobranchs
(3) The Docoglossa are regarded as the earliest gastropod offshoot, having retained ancestral (atereoglossate) radula conditions
(4) Based on various lines of evidence the ‘symmetrical’ limpet groups (Docoglossa, including hotvent group-C?, Cocculiniformia), primary without helicoid coiling of teteoconch, are accepted as primithe for the Gastropoda
(5) CocculinifOrmia, Neritimorpha and possibly hot-vent group-A represent distinct archaeogastropod radiations
(6) The Vetigastropoda, originally including zeugobranchs and trochoids are a hotophyletic group and include also the Lepetodriloidea (= hot-vent group-B). In contrast, the Neomphaloidea and Seguen zioidea represent distinct Lines of evolution
(7) According to their hypoathroid or dystenoid nervous system the architaenioglossate groups are included in the *Archaeogastropoda* which are defined as an orthophyletic grade
(8) A major evolutionary gap (a large inaease in size enabled ptanktotrophic larvae; epiathroid nervous system) separates the higher streptoneurans (= *Apogastropoda*) from the *Archaeogastropoda*. The Loxonematoidea are regarded as the common stem group of Caenogastropoda as well as of the ectobranch—allogastropod—euthyneuran line (Heterobranchia)
(9) The Caenogastropoda are a holophyletic group, of which the Centhioidea represent the basic stock. The Stenoglossa (= Neogastropoda) probably origined from *Neotaenioglossa* sharing distinct simitanSies in sperm-morphology
(10) Canpani1e symbolicum Iredale, 1917 (Campanhimorpha) is a probable representative of the first group that made a distinct step towards the euthyneuran organization
(11). Valvatoidea (Ectobranchia) form a separate offshoot outside the Caenogastropoda. They appear as an independent side-branch at the base of the allogastropod grade
(12) The *Allogastropoda*, a grade, include the fossil Nerineoidea and at least four recent lines (Architectonicoidea & Omalogyridae; Rissoelloidea; Glacidorboidea; Pyramidelloidea) which represent a step by step evolution towards the euthyneuran level of organization
(13) Euthyneura are monophyletic. However, the status of the Opisthobranchia (bob- or paraphyletic) is still ambiguous. The Pulmonata (including the Gymnomorpha) represent a holophyletic assemblage and the own group of Gastropoda
(14) The respective phylogram (Fig. 5) is transformed in a classification by the use of the so-called clado-evotutionary method which enables an unequivocal retransformation and expresses the different degrees of likelihood (correlated with the main evolutionary gaps) in the proposed phylogenetic pathway of the streptoneurous Gastropoda
(Received 15 October 1987; accepted 3 March 1988)
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. A. CAMPBELL, D. E. PETERSON, and A. C. ALFARO TWO NEW SPECIES OF RETISKENEA? (GASTROPODA: NEOMPHALIDAE) FROM LOWER CRETACEOUS HYDROCARBON-SEEP CARBONATES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2008; 82(1): 140 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. COOK, A. NUTZEL, and J. FRYDA TWO MISSISSIPPIAN CAENOGASTROPOD LIMPETS FROM AUSTRALIA AND THEIR MEANING FOR THE ANCESTRY OF THE CAENOGASTROPODA Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2008; 82(1): 183 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Nakano and T. Ozawa WORLDWIDE PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF LIMPETS OF THE ORDER PATELLOGASTROPODA: MOLECULAR, MORPHOLOGICAL AND PALAEONTOLOGICAL EVIDENCE J. Mollus. Stud., March 19, 2007; (2007) eym001v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Ruthensteiner Redescription and 3D morphology of Williamia gussonii (Gastropoda: Siphonariidae) J. Mollus. Stud., November 1, 2006; 72(4): 327 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sasaki, T. Okutani, and K. Fujikura Anatomy of Bathyacmaea secunda Okutani, Fujikura & Sasaki, 1993 (Patellogastropoda: Acmaeidae) J. Mollus. Stud., August 1, 2006; 72(3): 295 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. B. ANDREWS and K. E. THOROGOOD AN ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDY OF THE GLAND OF LEIBLEIN OF MURICID AND NASSARIID NEOGASTROPODS IN RELATION TO FUNCTION, WITH A DISCUSSION ON ITS HOMOLOGIES IN OTHER CAENOGASTROPODS J. Mollus. Stud., August 1, 2005; 71(3): 269 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Grande, J. Templado, J. Lucas Cervera, and R. Zardoya The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Nudibranch Roboastra europaea (Mollusca: Gastropoda) Supports the Monophyly of Opisthobranchs Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2002; 19(10): 1672 - 1685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. R. Page Apical Sensory Organ in Larvae of the Patellogastropod Tectura scutum Biol. Bull., February 1, 2002; 202(1): 6 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
GASTROPOD PHYLOGENETICS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS, AND IMPLICATIONS Journal of Paleontology, November 1, 2001; 75(6): 1128 - 1140.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S. Hickman and M. G. Hadfield Larval Muscle Contraction Fails to Produce Torsion in a Trochoidean Gastropod Biol. Bull., June 1, 2001; 200(3): 257 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. G. McArthur and V. Tunnicliffe Relics and antiquity revisited in the modern vent fauna Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 271 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|