Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Black, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Black, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

J. Moll. Stud. (1999), 65, 111-119
© The Malacological Society of London 1999

Nodilittorina Nodosa (Gray, 1839) Is a Plastic Morphotype of Nodilittorina Australis (Gray, 1826)

Michael S. Johnson and Robert Black

Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia. e-mail: msj{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au

The endemic Western Australian littorinids Nodilittorina nodosa (Gray, 1839) and N. australis (Gray, 1826) were described on the basis of distinctive shell morphologies: N. nodosa is characterized by distinct orange nodules, whereas N. australis typically has spiral grooves. In some places, intermediate phenotypes occur, and these have been interpreted as possible hybrids. In his 1989 review of the Littorinidae, Reid considered N. nodosa and N. australis to be conspecific, on the basis of their indistinguishable genital morphologies. However, a firm decision on their reproductive relationships requires reexamination of the morphological differences that were the basis of the original descriptions.

In some places, intermediate phenotypes are common. However, these intermediates generally produce alternative phenotypes at different stages of their growth, suggesting that the differences are not genetically determined. A preliminary translocation experiment confirmed the plasticity of these morphotypes, supporting the interpretation that the two forms are conspecific. Comparisons of allozymes also revealed no differences between N. nodosa and N. australis, even in areas where the morphotypes are distinct. Furthermore, extremely low levels of geographic variation of allelic frequencies indicate extensive gene flow. Thus, the contrasting shell forms are responses to environmental conditions faced by recruits from a common pool. An unusual feature of this plasticity is that the sculpture of new growth can change abruptly in response to a change in habitat.

(Received 10 February 1998; accepted 14 May 1998)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.