Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simison, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simison, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

J. Moll. Stud. (1999), 65, 99-109
© The Malacological Society of London 1999

Morphological and Molecular Resolution of a Putative Cryptic Species Complex: a Case Study of Notoacmea Fascicularis (Menke, 1851) (Gastropoda: Patellogastropoda)

W. Brian Simison1 and David R. Lindberg2

Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-4780, USA

1Email: simey{at}socrates.Berkeley.Edu

2Email: davidl{at}ucmp1.Berkeley.Edu

Evidence that Notoacmea fascicularis (Menke, 1851) is a complex of at least two distinct taxa of species rank is ambiguous. A discriminant function analysis of conchological data shows a weak geographic effect, while radular morphology clearly delineates two sympatric groups with rare intermediates. Lastly, molecular data (mt cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) suggests a single species and a geographic effect. We consider N. fascicularis to be a single taxon, variable for radular lateral tooth morphology. In the past these two different radular morphologies would be indicative of generic rank. Our knowledge of the intraspecific variability of most gastropod characters is poor, and this makes specific identifications or groupings based on single character systems such as the radula precarious. Adequate sampling and evaluation of population-level character states (conchological, anatomical and molecular) is needed to identify as well as falsify cryptic species complexes.

(Received 28 August 1997; accepted 6 May 1998)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J MOLLUS STUDHome page
M. C. De Aranzamendi, C. N. Gardenal, J. P. Martin, and R. Bastida
Limpets of the genus Nacella (Patellogastropoda) from the Southwestern Atlantic: species identification based on molecular data
J. Mollus. Stud., August 1, 2009; 75(3): 241 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J MOLLUS STUDHome page
P. J. Krug, M. S. Morley, J. Asif, L. L. Hellyar, and W. M. Blom
Molecular confirmation of species status for the rare cephalaspidean Melanochlamys lorrainae (Rudman, 1968), and comparison with its sister species M. cylindrica Cheeseman, 1881
J. Mollus. Stud., August 1, 2008; 74(3): 267 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J MOLLUS STUDHome page
T. Nakano and T. Ozawa
WORLDWIDE PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF LIMPETS OF THE ORDER PATELLOGASTROPODA: MOLECULAR, MORPHOLOGICAL AND PALAEONTOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
J. Mollus. Stud., March 19, 2007; (2007) eym001v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J MOLLUS STUDHome page
P. J. Krug, R. A. Ellingson, R. Burton, and A. Valdes
A new poecilogonous species of sea slug (Opisthobranchia: Sacoglossa) from California: comparison with the planktotrophic congener Alderia modesta (Loven, 1844)
J. Mollus. Stud., February 1, 2007; 73(1): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J MOLLUS STUDHome page
T. NAKANO and T. OZAWA
SYSTEMATIC REVISION OF PATELLOIDA PYGMAEA (DUNKER, 1860) (GASTROPODA: LOTTIIDAE), WITH A DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES
J. Mollus. Stud., November 1, 2005; 71(4): 357 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.