Journal Molluscan Studies Advance Access originally published online on June 28, 2005
Journal of Molluscan Studies 2005 71(3):253-256; doi:10.1093/mollus/eyi035
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHAPE DIFFERENCES AMONG BOREHOLES DRILLED BY THREE SPECIES OF NATICID GASTROPODS
1Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada;; 2Department of Land Resource Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada;; and 3Present address: Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4 Canada
Correspondence: M. Grey; e-mail: mgrey{at}eos.ubc.ca
Naticid gastropods leave a record of predation in the form of characteristic countersunk circular boreholes. We fed bivalve prey to naticids to test whether the ratio between the inner and outer borehole diameter differed among three Recent naticid species: Euspira heros, E. lewisii and Neverita duplicata. Fossil shells from a Miocene-aged assemblage, containing naticids previously identified as E. heros and N. duplicata, were also included in our analyses. Ratios of the inner to outer diameters of naticid boreholes in bivalve shells showed that there were significant differences in borehole shape between E. heros and the two other Recent species. We found no significant differences between the ratios of E. lewisii and N. duplicata; however, a principal component analysis showed that boreholes distinctly cluster according to species. The Miocene boreholes were also distinct from the Recent, indicating that the Miocene naticids may be a separate species from E. heros and N. duplicata. We have shown that there is a species-specific component to borehole geometry. This may have important implications for palaeobiological studies, because the index of borehole functionality, previously described as an inner to outer borehole ratio of 0.5 for all naticids, may differ between species.
(Received 23 March 2004; accepted 10 January 2005)
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. YANES and C. L. TYLER DRILLING PREDATION INTENSITY AND FEEDING PREFERENCES BY NUCELLA (MURICIDAE) ON LIMPETS INFERRED FROM A DEAD-SHELL ASSEMBLAGE Palaios, May 1, 2009; 24(5): 280 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hasegawa and S. Sato Predatory behaviour of the naticid Euspira fortunei: why does it drill the left shell valve of Ruditapes philippinarum? J. Mollus. Stud., May 1, 2009; 75(2): 147 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Schiffbauer, Y. Yanes, C. L. Tyler, M. Kowalewski, and L. R. Leighton The Microstructural Record of Predation: A New Approach for Identifying Predatory Drill Holes Palaios, December 1, 2008; 23(12): 810 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. AMANO TEMPORAL PATTERN OF NATICID PREDATION ON GLYCYMERIS YESSOENSIS (SOWERBY) DURING THE LATE CENOZOIC IN JAPAN Palaios, August 1, 2006; 21(4): 369 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Grey, E. G. Boulding, and M. E. Brookfield Estimating multivariate selection gradients in the fossil record: a naticid gastropod case study Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 100 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


