Skip Navigation



Journal Molluscan Studies Advance Access published online on July 28, 2008
Journal of Molluscan Studies, doi:10.1093/mollus/eyn020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/4/331    most recent
eyn020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koene, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wolters, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koene, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wolters, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Malacological Society of London, all rights reserved

MATE CHOICE IS NOT AFFECTED BY MATING HISTORY IN THE SIMULTANEOUSLY HERMAPHRODITIC SNAIL LYMNAEA STAGNALIS

Joris M. Koene, Mathieu J. Loose and Loes Wolters

Department of Animal Ecology, Faculty of Earth & Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: J.M. Koene; e-mail: joris.koene{at}falw.vu.nl


  Abstract

Mate choice based on mating history is one way to optimize the distribution of one's sperm. This is especially pertinent when donating semen is costly. Owing to sperm competition many species allocate different amounts of sperm depending on their partners' mating histories. The hermaphroditic Lymnaea stagnalis has a preference for inseminating different partners, rather than the same one twice. Moreover, virgin partners receive more sperm than nonvirgins. Here we aim to determine whether these hermaphrodites prefer to inseminate virgins. Therefore, focal animals were offered a choice between one mating partner raised in isolation and one raised in a group. For each rearing condition we also measured individual growth, onset of egg laying (waiting time) and hatching success. Of the growth parameters we found that only the asymptotic size differed, with the virgins attaining a larger size. This coincides with the delayed onset of laying selfed eggs by virgins. Selfed eggs did not differ in hatching success from outcrossed eggs. The choice experiment revealed that focal individuals mated randomly with animals raised in isolation (virgins) and raised in groups (nonvirgins). This leads us to conclude that the decisions about whether to mate with an encountered individual and how much sperm to donate to this individual are two separate processes.

(Received 12 February 2008; accepted 6 June 2008)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.